How Quantum Computing Will Transform Cryptocurrency
Embedded Files
07/29/2023 :: Jeremy Pickett :: Become a Patron :: Buy Me a Coffee (small tip) :: @jeremy_pickett :: Discussion (FB)
The emergence of practical quantum computers capable of running algorithms like Shor's to break common public-key encryption schemes poses an existential threat to cryptography securing technologies from blockchain to the internet; to navigate this transition and guard against quantum attacks, experts recommend migrating digital systems to next-generation post-quantum cryptographic standards designed to remain secure even in the era of quantum computing.
TL;DR: Quantum computing threatens to break the public-key cryptography underlying most current cybersecurity, necessitating a migration to "post-quantum" algorithms resistant to quantum attacks.
This article examines the looming threat quantum computing poses to cracking cryptographic techniques securing technologies from cryptocurrencies to HTTPS. It explores the history of quantum computing development and how qubits allow modeling immense computational complexity. With practical quantum devices emerging, many standard encryption techniques used widely today for secrecy and identity in technologies like blockchain face risks from quantum algorithms like Shor’s. However, research into quantum-safe cryptography aims to guard against these risks through encryption innovations resilient even against quantum capabilities. Migrating systems to post-quantum cryptographic standards provides a pathway to navigating the coming era of quantum disruption. But challenges remain around ensuring security and interoperability during the transition.
How Quantum Computing Will Transform Cryptocurrency Security
Quantum computing has long seemed a distant sci-fi dream - but practical systems now emerge poised to disrupt industries relying on traditional computational assumptions. For cryptocurrencies underpinned by cryptography for security and anonymity, quantum capabilities could profoundly impact core functionalities and principles. As nation-states and enterprises race toward quantum advantage, the crypto ecosystem must adapt through "post-quantum" cryptography to survive this looming threat.
The Dawn of the Quantum Era
First, what breakthroughs have brought functioning quantum computers closer to reality? While theories date back decades, key advances in physics, materials science and computer engineering only recently made quantum devices achievable.
In the 1990s and 2000s, researchers expanded theoretical models for quantum circuits and qubits. Around this time, D-Wave systems built early superconducting quantum annealers, though their capabilities remained limited. But by 2011, D-Wave had demonstrated quad-core quantum processing.
In 2019, Google achieved (alleged) quantum supremacy on specialized sampling tasks with its 53-qubit Sycamore chip. While still far from practical applications, this milestone proved quantum systems could outperform classical supercomputers at targeted workloads. Critics argued the narrow use cases lacked real-world implications, but the field continued advancing rapidly.
Last year, startups QuEra and Oriqn Computing unveiled chips with over 500 superconducting qubits. Major players like IBM now aim to unveil 4,000+ qubit systems within years. With exponential growth in qubit counts, the age of quantum advantage appears on the horizon.
How Quantum Computing Transforms Computational Power
These exponential gains result from quantum physics principles enabling massive parallel processing. While classical bits encode binary 0 or 1 states, qubits leverage quantum superposition to represent 0 and 1 simultaneously. Ten qubits can thus hold 1024 values at once - complexity growing exponentially with qubit counts.
When retrieved from superposition through measurement, qubits collapse probabilistically to binary states. Repeated runs obtain the most likely outcomes from immense combination spaces, ideal for optimizing immense problems like modeling molecular interactions. Superposition also enables quantum parallelism speeding computation.
However, quantum uncertainty means extracting useful solutions involves statistical sampling from noisy data. Error correction techniques can filter signal from noise, but remain a key research challenge as qubit counts grow. Still, if scaled, quantum computers hold revolutionary potential dwarfing conventional systems.
The Quantum Threat to Cryptography
These capabilities pose particular threats to cryptography, which secures systems by making decoding computationally infeasible without keys. Quantum algorithms like Shor's can efficiently crack many common public-key encryption schemes relied upon in contexts from online payments to device authentication.
For example, the RSA scheme used to issue SSL/TLS certificates securing web connections depends on factoring large prime numbers - a task functionally impossible for classical systems yet quickly solvable on quantum devices. Likewise, quantum computers undermine elliptic curve techniques popular in blockchain platforms by reducing discrete logarithm problems to trivial calculations.
Widespread availability of quantum cryptanalysis would essentially invalidate most encryption protocols used on the internet today. While nation state capabilities remain limited currently, many experts warn organizations to prepare for "Y2Q" - the day scalable quantum computing breaks legacy cryptography.
Implications for Cryptocurrencies and Blockchain
These risks carry major implications for cryptocurrencies and blockchain technologies underpinned by cryptography. Bitcoin's SHA256 hash algorithm could succumb to Grover's algorithm speeding brute force attacks. Digital signatures may also prove vulnerable - a particular concern for guaranteeing authenticity of transactions and blocks. There are some but few technical details on how quantum computing can compromise existing cryptography securing cryptocurrencies and distributed ledgers like blockchain
Grover's algorithm can speed brute force attacks against hash functions like SHA256 used in Bitcoin's mining and wallet addresses
Shor's algorithm can break elliptic curve cryptography used for digital signatures and key exchange in many platforms
Ability to forge signatures could allow illicit transactions and undermine integrity of ledger
Forward secrecy techniques used in TLS and other protocols also weakened when long-term keys become susceptible
Metadata analysis possible from intercepted encrypted traffic even if contents not cracked
Rising quantum risks necessitate transition to post-quantum cryptographic standards like lattice-based, hash-based, and code-based techniques
Additionally, quantum computing could overwhelm Bitcoin's proof-of-work model, achieving mining dominance by brute forcing solutions orders of magnitude faster with Grover's algorithm. However, the same risks apply to proof-of-stake protocols like Ethereum 2.0 since their security still depends on hardened cryptography.
Overall, quantum attacks pose an existential threat for public blockchain networks and cryptocurrencies premised on cryptographic security. Research into future-proofing these systems has become paramount.
The Quest for Quantum-Resistant Cryptography
Fortunately, work is already underway on next-generation "post-quantum" cryptography resilient even to attacks from quantum computers. Leading proposals include lattice-based, hash-based, code-based, and multivariate cryptographic schemes.
Lattice-based cryptography relies on the hardness of solving mathematical problems over lattices - grid-like structures of points unlikely to succumb to quantum shortcuts. Hash-based techniques use cryptographic hash functions tuned to resist quantum grover's algorithm. Code-based cryptography encodes messages resisting codebreaking even from quantum brute force.
In all approaches, the goal is selecting problems without known efficient solutions on quantum computers. Active research continues assessing proposed schemes' security, performance, and standardization readiness as the clock counts down to the quantum era.
Migrating the Internet to Post-Quantum Security
In response, global agencies have begun pushing to migrate digital infrastructure to post-quantum standards. In 2017, the NIST initiated a process to evaluate and standardize quantum-resistant public-key cryptography with a goal of transitioning most systems by 2030.
The TLS protocol behind web encryption already includes post-quantum options. Chrome, Edge and Firefox browsers now support CECPQ1 for TLS key exchange. However, prioritizing wide adoption of these standards remains critical before scalable quantum cryptanalysis emerges.
For cryptocurrencies, networks like Bitcoin Cash, Ethereum, and Algorand plan transitions to quantum-resistant signature schemes and hash functions to guard against forgery, spoofing, and manipulation risks. But their decentralized nature introduces implementation challenges without coordinated upgrades.
Responsible Disclosure of Cryptographic Vulnerabilities
This transition process raises ethical issues around disclosing cryptographic vulnerabilities that quantum advances expose. Publishing weaknesses found motivates upgrading but also informs threat actors. However, most experts argue security through obscurity fails long-term.
Cryptographers follow responsible disclosure principles giving developers time to patch issues before releasing details publicly. But standardizing environmentally hardened replacements proves more complex than disclosing isolated bugs. Navigating revelations balancing transparency and risks amid the quantum sea change remains vital.
Overall, the field emphasizes prudent coordinated disclosure unveiling quantum vulnerabilities only when remedies are implementable. With collective diligence, proactive mitigation helps manage turbulence of the oncoming quantum storm.
Is Quantum Cryptography an Alternative?
Beyond post-quantum cryptography, could quantum principles also enable fundamentally secure communications? Emerging quantum key distribution (QKD) techniques leverage quantum physics to create cryptographic keys between parties that are provably unbreakable and whose interception is detectable.
QKD exploits properties like photon polarization or quantum entanglement to share random secret keys. These quantum channels are intrinsically protected against passive eavesdropping or manipulation attempts which would disturb the channel observably. Future quantum networks could enable perfectly secure communication.
However, challenges around cost, infrastructure, and distance/scaling currently limit QKD. It generally requires point-to-point dedicated infrastructure excluding third parties. Therefore, post-quantum cryptography provides the most viable path currently for general cryptographic protocols. But QKD offers stronger guarantees for specialized use cases like high-value transfers.
The Road Ahead: Preparing for the Quantum Leap
The quantum epoch likely remains some years away but approaches inexorably. With vigilant cross-disciplinary collaboration, responsible disclosure, and accelerated migration to quantum-hardened standards, information security has opportunities to manage risks and navigate the coming turbulence smoothly.
While post-quantum cryptography cannot undo quantum computing's threats entirely, it provides resilience protecting the core of modern digital civilization. With care and continued innovation, society can keep critical communications, transactions, secrets and identities secure.
Quantum computing will shatter old certainties in computation but also catalyze immense innovation across science and society. New paradigms inevitably bring disruption alongside progress. But with wisdom and foresight, humanity can steer emerging powers toward emancipating potential rather than destabilizing extremes. The quantum future remains ours to shape.
Bernstein, D.J., Buchmann, J., & Dahmen, E. (Eds.). (2009). Post-Quantum Cryptography. Springer. https://link.springer.com/10.1007%2F978-1-4419-5906-5_386
Cryptocurrency Security Standard (CCSS). (2021). Post-Quantum Cryptography. https://cryptoconsortium.github.io/CCSS/standards/postquantum.html
Ducas, L., & Lepoint, T. (2015). Practical Lattice-Based Cryptography: A Signature Scheme for Embedded Systems. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 129-139.
European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI). (2021). Quantum-Safe Cryptography. https://www.etsi.org/technologies/quantum-safe-cryptography
Grover, L. K. (1996). A Fast Quantum Mechanical Algorithm for Database Search. Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing, 212-219.
Lange, T., & Bernstein, D. J. (2017). Post-Quantum Cryptography. Nature, 549(7671), 181-183.
Mosca, M., & Stebila, D. (2018). Post-Quantum Cryptography. Nature, 549(7671), 188-189.
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). (2021). Post-Quantum Cryptography. https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/post-quantum-cryptography
National Security Agency (NSA). (2021). Quantum Computing and Post-Quantum Cryptography. https://www.nsa.gov/Portals/70/documents/news-features/press-room/Quantum-Computing-and-Post-Quantum-Cryptography.pdf
Shor, P. W. (1994). Algorithms for Quantum Computation: Discrete Logarithms and Factoring. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 124-134.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7089691/
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319683742_Post-quantum_cryptography
https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/3ws6p/download
https://link.springer.com/10.1007%2F978-1-4419-5906-5_386
References by Perplexity.ai
#quantumcomputing #postquantum #cryptography #cryptocurrency #blockchain #bitcoin #ethereum #qubit #quantumsafety #quantuminformation #quantumphysics #quantumresistant #quantumproof #postquantumcrypto #latticecrypto #hashbasedcrypto #codebasedcrypto #groversalgorithm #shorsalgorithm #QKD
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse